SNP: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "=SNP Filtering Plans= ==Base Calling==" |
No edit summary |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=SNP | [[Category:Readings]] [[Category:Rajkumar]] [[Category:Biology]] | ||
== | |||
=Base Calling= | |||
* Minimum Read depth | |||
* Based on Phred scores | |||
* 1% error rate | |||
* Alignment (Trade off between accuracy and read depth) | |||
* Recalibration of Pherd scores | |||
** Essential | |||
** Phred score of ''Q'' should be = 10 to the power ''Q'' by 10 or less. This is done by alignning with the reference with the known SNPs | |||
= Homo and Heterozgous SNPs in a diploid= | |||
* Homozygous -> If an SNP (different than ref) base is counted across the read depth to be more than 80% | |||
* Hetorozygous -> If an SNP (different than ref) base is counted across the read depth to be less than 80% | |||
* Sequence/alignment Error -> If an SNP based is counted to be less than 10% | |||
* This is true of the depth is minimum of 20x | |||
= Accuracy in SNP calling = | |||
* Accuracy can be improved from single(Ref vs one sample) to multi samples (Ref vs several samles). | |||
** However false positives (SNP call) would also increase with more number of samples | |||
* Possible accuracy by read depth based SNP calling is 85% | |||
* '''Possible accuracy by LD (linkage disequilibrium) is >95%''' | |||
** Possible only when multi samples are used | |||
** Software that uses LD for SNP calling is Beagle, IMPUTE2, QCall, MaCH | |||
=Plan for SNP calling= | |||
* Assumptions | |||
** Multiple Genotypes instead of Ref vs One | |||
** Right combination (contrasting genotype types for specific type ) vs ref. | |||
** LD based SNP calling | |||
** Cross check the SNPs against all the 18 genotypes vs contrasting types | |||
* Filtering | |||
** Use of LD (Software would estimate this) | |||
** HapMap data (Go-through, how haplotypic frequency will help in filtering the best SNPs ) | |||
** Deviations from HWE (Estimate the allelic frequencies when HD is estimated and figure out how to estimate the variant SNPs to filter them off) | |||
---- | |||
[http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11032-016-0476-9 Pooled_Mapping] | |||
Latest revision as of 03:24, 2 June 2016
Base Calling
- Minimum Read depth
- Based on Phred scores
- 1% error rate
- Alignment (Trade off between accuracy and read depth)
- Recalibration of Pherd scores
- Essential
- Phred score of Q should be = 10 to the power Q by 10 or less. This is done by alignning with the reference with the known SNPs
Homo and Heterozgous SNPs in a diploid
- Homozygous -> If an SNP (different than ref) base is counted across the read depth to be more than 80%
- Hetorozygous -> If an SNP (different than ref) base is counted across the read depth to be less than 80%
- Sequence/alignment Error -> If an SNP based is counted to be less than 10%
- This is true of the depth is minimum of 20x
Accuracy in SNP calling
- Accuracy can be improved from single(Ref vs one sample) to multi samples (Ref vs several samles).
- However false positives (SNP call) would also increase with more number of samples
- Possible accuracy by read depth based SNP calling is 85%
- Possible accuracy by LD (linkage disequilibrium) is >95%
- Possible only when multi samples are used
- Software that uses LD for SNP calling is Beagle, IMPUTE2, QCall, MaCH
Plan for SNP calling
- Assumptions
- Multiple Genotypes instead of Ref vs One
- Right combination (contrasting genotype types for specific type ) vs ref.
- LD based SNP calling
- Cross check the SNPs against all the 18 genotypes vs contrasting types
- Filtering
- Use of LD (Software would estimate this)
- HapMap data (Go-through, how haplotypic frequency will help in filtering the best SNPs )
- Deviations from HWE (Estimate the allelic frequencies when HD is estimated and figure out how to estimate the variant SNPs to filter them off)