SNP: Difference between revisions

From RAJ INFO
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=SNP Filtering Plans=
[[Category:Readings]] [[Category:Rajkumar]] [[Category:Biology]]
==Base Calling==
 
=Base Calling=
* Minimum Read depth
* Minimum Read depth
* Based on Phred scores
* Based on Phred scores
Line 8: Line 9:
** Essential
** Essential
** Phred score of ''Q'' should be = 10 to the power ''Q'' by 10 or less. This is done by alignning with the reference with the known SNPs
** Phred score of ''Q'' should be = 10 to the power ''Q'' by 10 or less. This is done by alignning with the reference with the known SNPs
* '''Homo and Heterozgous SNPs in a diploid'''
 
** Homozygous -> If an SNP (different than ref) base is counted across the read depth to be more than 80%  
= Homo and Heterozgous SNPs in a diploid=
** Hetorozygous -> If an SNP (different than ref) base is counted across the read depth to be less than 80%
* Homozygous -> If an SNP (different than ref) base is counted across the read depth to be more than 80%  
** Sequence/alignment Error -> If an SNP based is counted to be less than 10%
* Hetorozygous -> If an SNP (different than ref) base is counted across the read depth to be less than 80%
** This is true of the depth is minimum of 20x
* Sequence/alignment Error -> If an SNP based is counted to be less than 10%
* Accuracy in SNP calling
* This is true of the depth is minimum of 20x
** Accuracy can be improved from single(Ref vs one sample)  to multi samples (Ref vs several samles)
= Accuracy in SNP calling =
** Possible accuracy by read depth based SNP calling is 85%
* Accuracy can be improved from single(Ref vs one sample)  to multi samples (Ref vs several samles).
** '''Possible accuracy by LD (linkage disequilibrium) is >95%'''  
** However false positives (SNP call) would also increase with more number of samples
*** Possible only when multi samples are used
* Possible accuracy by read depth based SNP calling is 85%
*** Software that uses LD for SNP calling is Beagle, IMPUTE2, QCall, MaCH
* '''Possible accuracy by LD (linkage disequilibrium) is >95%'''  
** Possible only when multi samples are used
** Software that uses LD for SNP calling is Beagle, IMPUTE2, QCall, MaCH
=Plan for SNP calling=
* Assumptions
** Multiple Genotypes instead of Ref vs One
** Right combination (contrasting genotype types for specific type ) vs ref.
** LD based SNP calling
** Cross check the SNPs against all the 18 genotypes vs contrasting types
* Filtering
** Use of LD (Software would estimate this)
** HapMap data (Go-through, how haplotypic frequency will help in filtering the best SNPs )
** Deviations from HWE (Estimate the allelic frequencies when HD is estimated and figure out how to estimate the variant SNPs to filter them off)
 
----
[http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11032-016-0476-9 Pooled_Mapping]

Latest revision as of 03:24, 2 June 2016


Base Calling

  • Minimum Read depth
  • Based on Phred scores
  • 1% error rate
  • Alignment (Trade off between accuracy and read depth)
  • Recalibration of Pherd scores
    • Essential
    • Phred score of Q should be = 10 to the power Q by 10 or less. This is done by alignning with the reference with the known SNPs

Homo and Heterozgous SNPs in a diploid

  • Homozygous -> If an SNP (different than ref) base is counted across the read depth to be more than 80%
  • Hetorozygous -> If an SNP (different than ref) base is counted across the read depth to be less than 80%
  • Sequence/alignment Error -> If an SNP based is counted to be less than 10%
  • This is true of the depth is minimum of 20x

Accuracy in SNP calling

  • Accuracy can be improved from single(Ref vs one sample) to multi samples (Ref vs several samles).
    • However false positives (SNP call) would also increase with more number of samples
  • Possible accuracy by read depth based SNP calling is 85%
  • Possible accuracy by LD (linkage disequilibrium) is >95%
    • Possible only when multi samples are used
    • Software that uses LD for SNP calling is Beagle, IMPUTE2, QCall, MaCH

Plan for SNP calling

  • Assumptions
    • Multiple Genotypes instead of Ref vs One
    • Right combination (contrasting genotype types for specific type ) vs ref.
    • LD based SNP calling
    • Cross check the SNPs against all the 18 genotypes vs contrasting types
  • Filtering
    • Use of LD (Software would estimate this)
    • HapMap data (Go-through, how haplotypic frequency will help in filtering the best SNPs )
    • Deviations from HWE (Estimate the allelic frequencies when HD is estimated and figure out how to estimate the variant SNPs to filter them off)

Pooled_Mapping